I started making an online mobile web app.
Abdul A Multimedia - AMA Designs
Sunday 1 June 2014
Wednesday 19 March 2014
Research Project Artefact 4
Research Project Artefact 4
Mobile Web Apps - Testing
Mobile Web Apps - Testing
•From my last artefact I came to a
conclusion that I wanted to test mobile web apps in different browsers to see
if they work they same on different browsers, I also found out that they Mobile
Web Apps only work on smartphone screen sizes, I want to test the mobile Web
App on a tablet and it did not work it went to the normal website.
•I tested Facebook on iPhone4s and on a Samsung
Galaxy. I tested on ten people in my family.
Iphone4s testing results
•Testing Facebook on the iPhone4s people
were happy using it, they found it easy to use across all the browsers but on the opera browser
it was not working very well and the design was different from the other
browsers, this is because the browser was not updated to handle Mobile Web
Apps. One problem was coming up that on all the browsers it was slow to load up
the content but on Firefox it was taking double the time from the other
browsers to load up.
•One browser that was good on both
platforms was “Dolphin browser” it was really good, the browser was fast and
very user friendly.
•All the browsers need to be updated to
handle the Mobile Web Apps, so if a Mobile Web App is not working well on a
browser is the browser fault not the Mobile Web App.
Iphone4s testing results screenshots
This across all of the browsers as you
can see there is not much of a difference between them, they all look the same.
Iphone4s testing results screenshots
Samsung Galaxy
testing results
•Testing Facebook on the Samsung Galaxy, I had the same responses as
I got for the iphone4s testing everything was the same, but on the Firefox was
crashing and not working very well at all and opera browser was the same as it
was on the iPhone.
•This across
all of the browsers as you can see there is not much of a difference between
them, they all look the same.
Samsung Galaxy testing results
conclusion
I
tested Facebook “Web App” on Apple and Android platforms,
I wanted to see what would be the
differences between the different browsers
and to see if
the Web App works the
same way as the Native App works.
I
tested Firefox, Google Chrome, Opera,
Dolphin and the default browsers on both platforms. I
also went to see that if the
Web App works on a tablet size screen and it did not
work on a Samsung Tab and on a iPad,
so by doing this testing I have found out two new things that I
was not aware of before I did this testing, one is that the Web Apps are similar across
the different browsers and the other one is that when they have
designed a Web App is only for “Smartphone” Screen
sizes.
I
have found out that it is not the Web App fault
that on some browser it
may not work properly, it is the browser
fault that it does not keep up to data
with the new Web App codes, browsers need to be be updating the browsers so
they can make the Web Apps useable and user friendly.
Most browsers are up to data to handle the Web Apps and
browsers are working very hard to be
able to handle Web Apps because I believe
the future would be using Web Apps
than native apps.
For
my next artefact I will be trying my best to make a very simple Web App and I will
see how hard it is to make and
to see if it works
the same across the different browsers.
Sunday 2 March 2014
Research Project Artefact 3
The
results from my last two artefacts showed that “Responsive Web Design” is
better than apps, these results were from the questioner and the testing that I
did.
I
researched online to find some evidence to support my results, I found some
good research supporting my results.
In
my research I came across “Mobile Web Apps”, which this is something new for me
to explore into.
Responsive
web design is better than apps in a lot of ways, responsive web design is one
coded website that fits all different kinds of screen sizes, it does not matter
what operating system your mobile or tablet is running on because it will work
on mobile, tablet and desktop, responsive
websites are also SEO friendly.
Some of the advantages of Responsive Web Design are:
–
In a Browser (No need to download
anything)
–
Single coded website– built once, runs
across all devices
–
Renders across any screen size – one can view the internet on 20′′
monitors, 15′′ laptops, 10′′ netbooks, 7′′ tablets, 3′′ smartphones and every
size between. It also considers the huge difference in widths and heights,
whether the screen is landscape or portrait, and screen resolution.
–
Improves SEO – a single
version of the website improves page ranking. Issues have arisen in which
having two versions of a site (website and mobile site) impact page ranking.
–
Reduces maintenance cost and effort due to single link.
–
Provides control and flexibility – changes can be made at one centralized
place. You do not need to contact multiple vendors to make changes when your
mobile site/ mobile application is built by different development companies.
-Ongoing
Maintenance – Lower maintenance cost, single version to maintain for the whole
website
Some of the disadvantages of Responsive Web Design are:
-It
takes more time and cost to design a responsive website than normal website
-User
experience – Navigation and layout
Native
apps(normal apps) are good and very useful, they are user friendly,
very easy to use. But you will need to design each app for different platforms
like Apple, Android, Windows and Blackberry.
Some of the advantages of Native Apps are:
-Performance
– fast, easy to use
-No
need for a browser
Some of the disadvantages of Native Apps are:
-Some
apps do not work offline
-More
time and cost consuming to make the app for each platform
-Some
apps do not work the same on different devices
and platforms e.g. a app on apple
might be different on the android or one app will work on the iPhone but will
not work the same on the iPad.
-Apps
need to be updated continuously so that you keep your customers or they will go
and there is always another app out there that will do the same.
-Continuously
testing the apps to make sure they work across all the platforms and making
sure they are free from bugs.
-Putting
your app out there is a big challenge to get your app at the top and apple
could deny your app when you submit to
apple after you have spent all the time and cost on it
-Apple
has very strict rules on apps, if you don’t do what they say your app is out!
"Mobile
Web App
development is an increasingly
popular field of mobile development. Unlike native apps which are downloaded to
a device, web apps run in-browser."
"Many
mobile users are still unsure about privacy & security issues when
downloading apps onto their phones and prefer to browse the web. Developing a
web app means that you can provide users with the same content as a native app
without them having to download anything."
"Web
apps are not covered by Apple &
Google’s app store policies and they don’t receive any of your money, so this
is an attractive prospect when developing apps as you have more freedom and
keep all the profit."
"Many
developers have also grown tired of trying to get make their apps visible in
the app stores – a feat that is covered on our app courses."
Some of the advantages of Mobile Web Apps are:
-Web
Apps run in-browser
-Same
features and design as native apps without downloading anything
-No
need to put them on the different app stores
-No
Google or Apple rules
-No
need to try to get you app at the top because it s a web app
-Uses
HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript
-Not
to much time and cost consuming
Some of the disadvantages of Mobile Web Apps are:
-On
android devices there is not much functionality as there is in Apple devises
-Speed
could be an issue
-Does
not work offline
conclusion
I
have found out that Responsive Websites can’t do the same elements as you could
with a Native App, when you design and create a Responsive Website you make it
for Desktop, Tablet and Smartphones and there are a lot of different screen
sizes, so on certain screen sizes, you might lose some content because if you
have a lot of information on a desktop website it’s ok but when you view it on
a smartphone you might need to lose some content of that because the user will
not want to scroll a lot to view the content so then this will be bad for user
experiences.
Apps
are very hard, very challenging and there is a lot of apps that do the same job
and you have to work very hard to make your app popular and there is different
app coding for different platforms, as a developer you will need to spend a lot
of time to create a good app and the cost is very high, so these things make
clients and developers to think again.
I
have found out that you can make a “Web App”. Web App is based in browser it’s
single coded using HTML5 CSS3 and JavaScript, there is no need to download the
app because you just view it using your smartphone browser, its not very hard
to create, time and cost are not high.
This
research has made me to look into “Web Apps” to find out if they work the same
on different browsers such as Safari, Firefox and Chrome etc. I would also test
the Web Apps on some friends to see if they like using it and if they can get around it easy.
“We
recommend that you always have a mobile friendly site – whether that is a
separate site or a responsive main site. At the minimum, this allows your
customers to easily access and browse your site from mobile devices.“
“If
you want to offer a different
experience to your site then a mobile app is the way forward but as yet there
is no clear winner between native and web apps.“
“The
design of your website and mobile service should be based on your target
audience. Building a site using either approach requires thorough planning and
a good understanding of the user’s roadmap through the site on every type of
device.”
“Therefore, if you want a solution that’s easy to
maintain, makes use of existing skills and that you can control, then
Responsive Web Design is the approach for you. If you want a high quality user
experience, better performance, faster implementation and seamless
transactions, then you should select Mobile Web App for your business.“
Research Project Artefact 2
Testing
For my second artefact I have chosen to test some apps and their websites physically on some of my family, friends and my neighbours on my street, I have had 25 responses.
I have chosen these seven apps because
they also have a responsive website, another reason why I have chosen these
apps because from my first artefact I had a lot of responses from these types’
of apps.
•These are the apps that I will be
testing.
•BBC News
•Starbucks
•Pinterest
•Flicker
•Instagram
•Facebook
•Twitter
• I asked the people to compare the Apps
against the websites.
• The question I asked them were:
• Which one is easy to use?
• Do you find the navigation menu easy?
• Can you find your way around?
• Which one will you prefer to use?
• The devices I used for the test were a
Apple iPhone and a Android tablet.
For BBC NEWS I got very good positive
feedback for the App and the website, people were happy with the app and the
website.
One thing that was pointed out a lot
about the app was that its to boring and not as much as interesting as the
website, but that was only on the Android App. However, they were happy with
the iPhone App.
I was amazed that people liked both of
them I thought that they will like only one of them, I also tested it myself
and I did not find something different between them too.
Starbucks App was not very easy to use on
the iPhone, as you went to the App it was too boring and when you select the
drinks it gives you a lot of drinks and it was not appealing or interesting,
people said its too boring because its got too much text.
On the android table the app was not
working, when I went on to the android App market it said, “Your Device isn’t
compatible with this version”.
People liked to use the website both on
the iPhone and Android tablet, they find it a lot easier to get around the
website and they said the navigation was very easy to use and understand.
These responses show me that both on the
iPhone and the Android tablet the App is not very good and useful, this shows
the website is better than the app, I believe that Starbucks have gave more
attention to their website than their App.
For Pinterest I
had very similar positive answers for both the App and the website. People were
happy with using the app and the website and they could navigate around it easy
on both. No negative points were pointed out.
The feedbacks I got for Flicker were
positive, the people were happy using the App and the website on both
platforms, there wasn’t much different between the Apps and the websites.
But a lot of more people liked the iPhone
app than the Android App, they said its more easier to use, has a more easier
interface and they can also take photos and upload it straight away like Instagram,
Facebook, Twitter etc.
For Instagram I got both negative and positive
things pointed out, everyone was happy with using the App on the iPhone and
Android Tablet, they were saying its very easy to use and to navigate around.
The website on the iPhone was good as
well but not as good as the App, people said that they would not mind using it
than the App but one thing was pointed out a lot that on the website you could
not take the photo and upload it straight away.
The website on the tablet was very bad
you could not do anything, you could only see what your friends photos, you
could not even go to your own profile.
For Facebook I had very good positive
feedback, everyone was happy with using both App and the website both on the
iPhone and the Android Table, people found to use both platforms very easy. No
negative points were made.
For Twitter I got very good positive
feedbacks for both the App and the website, everything was the same on both
platforms the iPhone and the Android tablet. Everything was easy to use and you could
navigate around easily.
Conclusion
After
doing my second artefact, it shows me that there isn’t much of a difference
between the App and the website and the different platforms of operating
systems. Comparing Apple IOS to Android IOS there is a little bit difference
between them, most of the Apple Apps are better than the Android Apps,
comparing an iPhone App design to an Android App there is a massive difference
between them, the iPhone App design looks better.
For
example the “Starbucks” app is working on the iPhone but on the Android its
say’s “Your Device isn’t compatible with this version”, so this doesn’t make an
sense; why would you have an App working on iPhone but not working on android?
Or why would you even have App on the App store that would not work?
I
have come to a decision that I believe the website would be better to have,
because if you are making an App for both platforms I think it wont look the
same on both platforms as I have found out in my experiments.
I
believe that if you make a really high standard responsive website it would be
better than the app as I have found, for example the “Pinterest” App you can’t
tell the difference between the App or the responsive website.
When
you have downloaded an App it uses space and if you don’t have no internet
connection it will not work, for the website you don’t need any space because
its on the web but also if you don’t have internet connection it will not work,
but on the iPhone for example you can add a webpage to view or read offline
which means you can view a page or something when you have no internet
connection.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)